Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (Print PDF) Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (Screen PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Apic, G.
Right arrow Articles by Teichmann, S. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Apic, G.
Right arrow Articles by Teichmann, S. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Bioinformatics Vol. 17 no. 90001 2001
Pages S83-S89
© 2001 Oxford University Press

An insight into domain combinations

Gordana Apic 1, Julian Gough 1 and Sarah A. Teichmann 2

1 MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 2QH, UK
2 Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, University College London, Darwin Bldg., Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, UK

Received on February 6, 2001 ; revised on March 29, 2001 ; accepted on March 29, 2001

Domains are the building blocks of all globular proteins, and are units of compact three-dimensional structure as well as evolutionary units. There is a limited repertoire of domain families, so that these domain families are duplicated and combined in different ways to form the set of proteins in a genome. Proteins are gene products. The processes that produce new genes are duplication and recombination as well as gene fusion and fission. We attempt to gain an overview of these processes by studying the structural domains in the proteins of seven genomes from the three kingdoms of life: Eubacteria, Archaea and Eukaryota. We use here the domain and superfamily definitions in Structural Classification of Proteins Database (SCOP) in order to map pairs of adjacent domains in genome sequences in terms of their superfamily combinations. We find 624 out of the 764 superfamilies in SCOP in these genomes, and the 624 families occur in 585 pairwise combinations. Most families are observed in combination with one or two other families, while a few families are very versatile in their combinatorial behaviour. This type of pattern can be described by a scale-free network. Finally, we study domain repeats and we compare the set of the domain combinations in the genomes to those in PDB, and discuss the implications for structural genomics.

Contact: apic{at}mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
B. Lee and D. Lee
DAhunter: a web-based server that identifies homologous proteins by comparing domain architecture
Nucleic Acids Res., July 1, 2008; 36(suppl_2): W60 - W64.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
G. H. B. Maegawa, M. Tropak, J. Buttner, T. Stockley, F. Kok, J. T. R. Clarke, and D. J. Mahuran
Pyrimethamine as a Potential Pharmacological Chaperone for Late-onset Forms of GM2 Gangliosidosis
J. Biol. Chem., March 23, 2007; 282(12): 9150 - 9161.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
M. Wang and G. Caetano-Anolles
Global Phylogeny Determined by the Combination of Protein Domains in Proteomes
Mol. Biol. Evol., December 1, 2006; 23(12): 2444 - 2454.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BioinformaticsHome page
K. Lin, L. Zhu, and D.-Y. Zhang
An initial strategy for comparing proteins at the domain architecture level
Bioinformatics, September 1, 2006; 22(17): 2081 - 2086.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
J. Weiner 3rd and E. Bornberg-Bauer
Evolution of Circular Permutations in Multidomain Proteins
Mol. Biol. Evol., April 1, 2006; 23(4): 734 - 743.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BioinformaticsHome page
D. Park, S. Lee, D. Bolser, M. Schroeder, M. Lappe, D. Oh, and J. Bhak
Comparative interactomics analysis of protein family interaction networks using PSIMAP (protein structural interactome map)
Bioinformatics, August 1, 2005; 21(15): 3234 - 3240.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BioinformaticsHome page
M. Liu, S. Wu, H. Walch, and A. Grigoriev
Exon-domain correlation and its corollaries
Bioinformatics, August 1, 2005; 21(15): 3213 - 3216.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
A. Fernandez, R. Scott, and R. S. Berry
The nonconserved wrapping of conserved protein folds reveals a trend toward increasing connectivity in proteomic networks
PNAS, March 2, 2004; 101(9): 2823 - 2827.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
K. Fleming, A. Muller, R. M. MacCallum, and M. J. E. Sternberg
3D-GENOMICS: a database to compare structural and functional annotations of proteins between sequenced genomes
Nucleic Acids Res., January 1, 2004; 32(90001): D245 - 250.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genome ResHome page
G. Caetano-Anolles and D. Caetano-Anolles
An Evolutionarily Structured Universe of Protein Architecture
Genome Res., July 1, 2003; 13(7): 1563 - 1571.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
T. Pawson and P. Nash
Assembly of Cell Regulatory Systems Through Protein Interaction Domains
Science, April 18, 2003; 300(5618): 445 - 452.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
L. Coin, A. Bateman, and R. Durbin
Enhanced protein domain discovery by using language modeling techniques from speech recognition
PNAS, April 15, 2003; 100(8): 4516 - 4520.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.